- Science Says
- Posts
- The optimal text/visuals balance
The optimal text/visuals balance
Images perform worse on social media when the text is too large or when the text and imagery refer to different concepts.
🎓 New to Science Says? This is a 3-min practical summary of a scientific study 📩 Subscribe for $0 to get one weekly, or join the 📈 paid version for 300+ insights, real-life case studies, and the exclusive Playbook of Brand Names.
📩 Important: A quick ask so you don't miss the next insight (it takes 6 seconds)
Email providers (like Gmail or Apple Mail) sometimes need a reminder that these insights are important to you. Otherwise, they may gradually downgrade them to your promotions or spam folders (and if that happens, we may stop sending them to your email).
To make sure you keep getting them:
Gmail: Drag or move this email to your Primary tab. Click "Yes" when prompted to apply this to future messages.
Others: Add [email protected] to your Contacts or "VIP/Safe Senders" list.
Thank you for helping keep Science Says in your inbox! 🎓
📝 Context
Topics: Social Media
For: B2C
Research date: August 2025
Universities: The University of Hong Kong, University of Nottingham, Shenzhen University
You’re building a new social media campaign for your latest skincare line and are brainstorming content ideas for the launch.
You want to showcase the new packaging design, but most importantly, you want people to know your product now has sustainable ingredients, something your clients have been asking for.
How should you balance showing off the new design with the key core messaging? What's more important, the visual or the text?
New research shows us how to balance creatives to get higher engagement.
P.S.: If you’re planning on using video ads rather than static images, this insight tells you what makes people tick based on brain scans.
Want hundreds more insights like these? Explore all Science Says insights here.
📈 Recommendation
When creating images for social media, follow these design rules:
Ensure your text and visuals are saying the same thing, so they don’t compete for attention (e.g. don't pair an image of a model wearing a summer dress with copy about your free returns policy).
Place the text centrally, and write it in a positive and informative tone.
If the image is complex (e.g. shows a social situation with multiple people and elements), use smaller text overlays.
People will be more likely to engage with your image.

Pro tip: If you’re using videos instead of images, follow the optimal text overlay formula, have the text overlay be around 11% of the frame on Instagram, and up to 46% on Twitter
🎓 Findings
People were more likely to engage with image posts on social media when text and visuals did not compete for attention.
As part of an analysis of over 30,000 organic brand posts from 195 brand accounts across 9 product categories on Facebook and Instagram, researchers found that:
Posts had lower engagement when:
Large text overlays were paired with complex images (e.g. containing multiple objects in the background, depicting social settings with faces)
Posts had bigger texts that overshadowed the visuals (e.g. the text was covering details)
Posts had higher engagement when:
The text was not overshadowing the image (e.g. covering visual details), centered, with a positive tone, and informative rather than wordy (e.g. "New arrivals this season" vs. "Check out all the amazing new products we just added this week")
The text and the image were communicating the same message (e.g. an image of a forest with an overlay “Amazonian coffee beans”)
🧠 Why it works
We are naturally drawn to visually rich content (e.g. images showing many objects or faces), which instinctively captures our attention.
When rich visuals are paired with big text overlays, they compete for our attention, and we don't focus on either.
However, when we receive the same information both visually and verbally (e.g. an image of a product paired with a short line describing its benefit), we process the message more easily.
This makes us more likely to engage with it.
Want to advertise to 30,000+ Science Says readers here? Click here.
✋ Limitations
The research measured engagement in terms of likes and comments only. It’s unclear how text-visual ratio affects views, clicks, or purchase intentions.
The study found some effects were stronger on Facebook than Instagram, possibly because Facebook is less image-oriented. It wasn't tested how the effect would carry over to video-based platforms (e.g. TikTok) or text-based platforms (e.g. X), though it's likely the effect is similar.
Only organic content was analyzed, it’s unclear how the effect applies to ads, though it is likely similar.
👀 Real-life example
PerfectTed is a matcha drink brand. They are one of the fastest-growing brands in the UK and are very active on social media.

❌ Issue: The post in which they invite their community to join them for their new product launch got a low response. The visual was not optimized for engagement.
✅ Solution: A few changes PerfectTed can make to future announcements:
Keep the text in a central position, but make it bigger and more visible. For example, by making it look like a clear text overlay (in this example, the copy is easily missed).
Add context to the copy (e.g. “You’re invited to the product launch”) and communicate the same message through the image and the text (e.g. show pistachios and images of past events).
Tweak the messaging so that it has a social-related use and makes people think of others (e.g. “Bring your friends”), making them more likely to share the post
🔍 Study type
Market observation (analysis of 34,610 organic posts from 195 official brand accounts on Facebook and Instagram)
📖 Research
When Words Meet Visuals: How Content Composition Drives Social Media Engagement for Marketer-Generated Content. Journal of Marketing Research (August 2025)
🏫 Researchers
Chu (Ivy) Dang. The University of Hong Kong
Canice M. C. Kwan. University of Nottingham
Jayson S. Jia. The University of Hong Kong
Yang Shi. Shenzhen University
Remember: This is a new scientific discovery. In the future it will probably be better understood and could even be proven wrong (that’s how science works). It may also not be generalizable to your situation. If it’s a risky change, always test it on a small scale before rolling it out widely.
🎁 Bonus: Trivia
Check your knowledge from previous insights (for paid Platform members only).
❓ Guess the effect:When should you use emotional messaging in your ads? |
What did you think of today's insight?Help me make the next insights 🎓 even more useful 📈 |
Here is how else Science Says can help your marketing:
📈 Join the Science Says Platform to unlock all 300+ insights, real-world case studies, and exclusive playbooks
📘 Boost your sales and profits with topic-specific Science-based Playbooks (e.g. Pricing, Ecommerce, SaaS, AI Best Practices)
🔬 Get science-based insights for your industry or niche. My team of PhDs and I regularly help leading brands in FMCG, retail, and tech. Find out more.
🎓 It took 3 of us 13 hours to accurately turn this 47-page research paper into this 3min insight.
If you enjoyed it please share it with a friend, or share it on LinkedIn and tag me (Thomas McKinlay), I’d love to engage and amplify!
If this was forwarded by a friend you can subscribe below for $0 👇
