- Science Says
- Posts
- Make your packaging transparent
Make your packaging transparent
People were up to 4x more likely to choose a food product that had transparent vs covered packaging.
🎓 New to Science Says? This is a 3-min practical summary of a scientific study 📩 Subscribe for $0 to get one weekly, or join the 📈 paid version for 300+ insights, real-life case studies, and the exclusive Playbook of Brand Names.
This insight is brought to you by… Modash
Learn directly from the influencer marketers behind creator programs at Moroccanoil, L'Oréal & Edelman.
Learn about:
Identifying brand aesthetic and must-haves
How creators reshape customer perception
The power of organic product placement in non-salesy content
Join this special 3-hour edition of Modash LIVE, for $0
📅 June 11 at 10AM ET.
Want to sponsor Science Says? Here’s all you need to know.
📝 Context
Topic: Product
For: B2C
Research date: February 2026
Universities: Vienna University of Economics and Business, City University of London.
You’re shopping for chocolates, and come across two brands at the same price, one in a blue plastic box, and the other in a transparent plastic bag.
Chances are you’ll choose the second option, as the science says transparent packaging is more likely to attract us.
P.S.: When using color in your packaging, use dark colors to make your product seem more effective (unless you're worried people will think about its risks or side effects).
📈 Recommendation
Use transparent packaging or add a transparent cut-out window to your packaging for products. If your product isn’t visually appealing (e.g. frozen gravy), then stick to closed packaging.
People will be more likely to choose your product.

🎓 Findings
People find more attractive, are more likely to choose, and are more interested in buying food products with transparent packaging (e.g. see-through packaging or a cut-out window), compared to products with packaging they can’t see through.
As part of a series of 7 experiments on various household food items, researchers found that:
When an item had transparent, instead of covered packaging, people:
Were 4x more likely to choose it
Were 40.6% more interested in buying it
Thought the item was 67.2% more attractive and felt ownership of it
The effect:
Disappears when people are buying an item for someone else.
Reverses if the product itself doesn’t look nice. For example, people were 3.5% less interested in buying a vegetable stew in transparent packaging.
🧠 Why it works
We consider product packaging as a barrier between us and a product. While covered packaging hides what’s inside, transparent packaging removes that barrier, letting us see the actual item.
Because we can see the actual item, we feel more ownership towards it, even before buying it. This makes us more interested in buying the product.
Since we can see the item inside, we also feel more in control and give more attention to what’s inside.
🔎 You've seen what doing it wrong looks like. The hard part is finding what actually works.
There's no shortage of AI "hacks" and generic webinars promising to fix your visibility. What's missing? Practitioners who've actually broken the silo, unified their brand signals, and built something that holds.
BreakingSilos 2026 is a free online conference on June 9th. No vendor pitches. No generic panels. Just the people who've done it - across SEO, PR, Content, Brand, and Social.
This announcement was sponsored. Want your brand here? Click here.
✋ Limitations
The experiments focused on everyday food items (e.g. cinnamon, muesli, candy, and cookies). It’s unclear how much this can be broadened to other types of items like toiletries or technology products.
The research looked mostly at items people hadn’t already used or tried. It’s unclear if the effect holds for returning buyers.
The study didn’t look at how much of the packaging needs to be transparent, or where a cut-out should be positioned. It’s unknown if more transparency in packaging will increase the effect or not.
👀 Real-life example
Asian noodles and sauces brand Omsom uses completely covered packaging for their products.

❌ Issue: The packaging makes it impossible for shoppers to see the product inside.
✅ Solution: Omsom can optimize their packaging by:
Introducing transparent packaging, or a transparent cut-out window on their boxes and packets, to make more of the content visible.
Simplifying the design of their packaging, to increase how much people are willing to pay for the item.
Increasing the color saturation on images of their jars and bottles, to make them seem larger and increase how much people are willing to pay for the product.
🔍 Study type
Lab and online experiments.
📖 Research
A window of opportunity: transparent packaging affects product preference via psychological ownership. International Journal of Research in Marketing (February 2026).
🏫 Researchers
Eva Marckhgott. Vienna University of Economics and Business
Bernadette Kamleitner. Vienna University of Economics and Business
Zachary Estes. Bayes Business School, City, University of London
Remember: This is a new scientific discovery. In the future it will probably be better understood and could even be proven wrong (that’s how science works). It may also not be generalizable to your situation. If it’s a risky change, always test it on a small scale before rolling it out widely.
🎁 Bonus: Trivia
Check your knowledge from previous insights (for paid Platform members only).
❓ Guess the effect:Which description for a cookie would likely lead to the highest sales? |
What did you think of today's insight?Help me make the next insights 🎓 even more useful 📈 |
Here is how else Science Says can help your marketing:
📈 Join the Science Says Platform to unlock all 300+ insights, real-world case studies, and exclusive playbooks
📘 Boost your sales and profits with topic-specific Science-based Playbooks (e.g. Pricing, Ecommerce, SaaS, AI Best Practices)
🔬 Get science-based thought leadership content for your brand. We help market leaders in AI, tech, and across B2B enterprises, build authoritative thought leadership using a scientific perspective. Find out more.
🎓 It took me, a PhD analyst, and a marketing pro 11.5 hours to accurately turn this 18 page research paper into this 3min insight.
If you enjoyed it please share it with a friend, or share it on LinkedIn and tag me (Thomas McKinlay), I’d love to engage and amplify!
If this was forwarded by a friend you can subscribe below for $0 👇
