- Science Says
- Posts
- Don’t recommend your most expensive option
Don’t recommend your most expensive option
When labelling a product as “recommended” choose a mid-priced option, not the most expensive one. Sales were up to 58% higher.
🎓 New to Science Says? This is a 3-min practical summary of a scientific study 📩 Subscribe for $0 to get one weekly, or join the 📈 paid version for access to 300+ insights.
This insight is brought to you by the Science Says Platform
The Science Says newsletter keeps you up to date, and I hope you’re loving it 💜
If you’re a marketing pro, we built the Science Says Platform to be the place you turn to before any project to check “What is the latest evidence I should know about, so I get the best possible results?”
You’ll find all our 300+ insights, like:
Want to sponsor Science Says to get in front of 30,000+ subscribers? Here’s all you need to know.
Topic: Pricing | Ecommerce
For: B2C, can be tested for B2B
Research date: July 2026
Universities: Nanyang Technological University, Indiana University Bloomington
📈 Recommendation
Don’t label as “recommended” the most expensive product in your lineup (e.g. a premium package). Instead, recommend a cheaper alternative (e.g. a mid-tier priced one, one you know sells very well).
People will be much more likely to choose it, increasing your overall sales and likely your profits.
If the most expensive option is the best fit, give an objective reason for why you’re recommending it (e.g. “Our Bestseller” or “XYZ Judge’s Choice”).

🎓 Findings
As part of a series of 8 experiments with over 6,200 participants, researchers found that:
Sales for a recommended drink at a South Korean cafe increased 58% when a more expensive option was also available, while both were equal without the recommendation
People were 24% more interested in buying when the recommended option was the cheapest one, and 8% less interested when it was the most expensive one
Adding an “Amazon’s choice” label increased people choosing a product by 159% when it was the second-most-expensive option, but by 357% when a competitor’s prices made it the third-cheapest option
🧠 Why it works
We assume companies are trying to influence us when labelling something as "recommended".
When they recommend the most expensive option, we assume they're just trying to make more profit and judge them differently.
If the recommended option is at a lower price, we're more likely to accept the recommendation because we don’t see an ulterior motive.
This can look like the decoy effect, where adding another option changes what people choose, but differs because adding a more expensive option only helped when the cheaper product was also recommended.
✋ Limitations
The study looked at items where the price was visible and could be compared (e.g. similar boxes of pasta). It’s likely the effect doesn’t work if there are clear differences between the products (e.g. 1 pasta is organic and 1 is wholewheat).
The effect is likely weaker for products where people rely heavily on recommendations (e.g. choosing a hotel for vacation or buying a car).
👀 Real-life example
Bedding and towels brand Cozy Earth highlights certain options to nudge customers towards those items.

❌ Issue: The towels marked as “Selling Fast” are more expensive than the other options.
✅ Solution:
Recommend a cheaper option with the “Selling Fast” badge instead of the most expensive option.
Add a badge with details to justify the price difference between the recommended set and other sets (e.g. “Ultra-soft fabric”).
Highlight features of the towel sets instead of the price, and test showing the price later, after someone clicks on a specific towel set.
Use rounded prices (e.g. $360 instead of $364), as these work better for items bought for pleasure or luxury, as compared to utility.
📖 Research
Kim, K., & Schrift, R., To Profit or to Assist? How the Interplay Between Product Recommendations and Relative Price Impacts Consumers’ Inferences and Choice. Journal of Consumer Research (July 2026).
Remember: This is a new scientific discovery. In the future it will probably be better understood and could even be proven wrong (that’s how science works). It may also not be generalizable to your situation. If it’s a risky change, always test it on a small scale before rolling it out widely.
🎁 Bonus: Trivia
Check your knowledge from previous insights (for paid Platform members only).
❓ Guess the effect:If you’re looking for people to put in an offer and start negotiating (e.g. to rent a house), what’s the best listing price? |
What did you think of today's insight?Help me make the next insights 🎓 even more useful 📈 |
Here is how else Science Says can help you:
📈 Join the Science Says Platform to unlock all 300+ insights and exclusive playbooks
📘 Boost your results with Science-based Playbooks (for Pricing, Ad Creatives, Ecommerce, or SaaS)
🔬 Get science-based content for your brand. Publish groundbreaking insights about AI, marketing, or management that your customers will love.
🎓 It took our team of PhDs and me 11 hours to accurately turn this research into this 3-min insight.
If this was forwarded by a friend, you can subscribe below for $0 👇
