- Science Says
- Posts
- Creators quit pro-AI platforms
Creators quit pro-AI platforms
Content creators engage less on pro-AI social media platforms, and 75% of their comments towards AI are negative.
🎓 New to Science Says? This is a 3-min practical summary of a scientific study 📩 Subscribe for $0 to get one weekly, or join the 📈 paid version for access to 300+ insights.
This insight is brought to you by… the Science Says Platform
The Science Says newsletter keeps you up to date, and I hope you’re loving it 💜
If you’re a pro, we built the Science Says Platform to be the place you turn to before any project to check “What is the latest evidence I should know about, so I get the best possible results?”
You’ll find all our 300+ insights, like:
Only paid Platform members can access them all 24/7, along with the exclusive playbook of brand names.
Want to sponsor Science Says to get in front of 30,000+ subscribers? Here’s all you need to know.
Topic: AI | Social Media
For: B2C. Can be tested for B2B
Research date: September 2026
Universities: New York University
📈 Recommendation
If you work in social media (e.g. influencer marketing), pay attention to the AI stance of the platforms you’re investing in. The platforms that are investing the most in AI (e.g. X, Quora) will likely see decreasing engagement from creators.
In the long term, focus on platforms with a balanced or anti-AI stance.

🎓 Findings
Scientists analyzed over 1.5 million posts across two platforms with different AI policies and found that, on pro-AI platforms:
Engagement from creators significantly decreased
75% of AI-related opinions shared by creators are negative (e.g. concerns about AI replacing human work with lower quality outputs, copyright infringements)
Of those opinions, only 7% relate to the AI feature itself, but roughly over 50% criticize the pro-AI stance of the platform
The effect is:
Stronger among popular creators, and creators who have a following on other platforms
Stronger among creators with negative attitudes towards AI
Weaker among creators who have been on the platform for longer
🧠 Why it works
Creators see pro-AI policies as a threat to their artistic identity and diversity.
They also see their work being used without consent to train AI systems.
These make them less likely to engage as they fear their work might be misused and replaced by AI.
✋ Limitations
The study looked at two platforms where engagement is driven by the content itself and the creator's personal brand is of secondary importance (e.g. Reddit). The effect might differ on platforms where the creator’s personal brand is more important (e.g. Instagram).
Creators might be more willing to stay engaged on pro-AI platforms if the feature benefits them (e.g. AI suggesting viral content formats).
The AI stances of the platforms studied were extreme, one actively invested in and promoted AI, while the other had a strict AI ban. Intermediate AI policies (e.g permissive with labeling, restrictive with AI training data) might have different effects.
👀 Real-life example
Most platforms are experimenting with AI features. TikTok Symphony Creative Studio is one of those, letting users create trending AI-generated content.

✅ Solution: AI features have the potential to disrupt engagement. Platforms might integrate AI differently to avoid this risk, for example:
Avoiding AI content creation features. “Made with AI” content gets lower engagement, so AI might be better integrated into analytics or planning instead of the content itself.
AI can be used to help creators reply to comments from their audiences at scale, with up to 43% higher future engagement, but only if it’s clear it’s an AI responding to the comments.
📖 Research
Huang, H., Fu, R., & Ghose, A. Generative AI, Platform Stances, and Content Creator Behavior. Information Systems Research (September 2026).
Remember: This is a new scientific discovery. In the future it will probably be better understood and could even be proven wrong (that’s how science works). It may also not be generalizable to your situation. If it’s a risky change, always test it on a small scale before rolling it out widely.
What did you think of today's insight?Help me make the next insights 🎓 even more useful 📈 |
Here is how else Science Says can help you:
📈 Join the Science Says Platform to unlock all 300+ insights and exclusive playbooks
📘 Boost your results with Science-based Playbooks (for Pricing, Ad Creatives, Ecommerce, or SaaS)
🔬 Get science-based content for your brand. Publish groundbreaking insights about AI, marketing, or management that your customers will love.
🎓 It took our team of PhDs and me 13 hours to accurately turn this research into this 3-min insight.
If this was forwarded by a friend, you can subscribe below for $0 👇
